Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, employment OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for employment her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would in fact mean. BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is because there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you think about a buyout, employment there’s usually some sort of written arrangement or a concrete offer to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no warranties included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful since leaving earlier than planned can have severe effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a good offer for people who don’t want to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really generously offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: employment It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes because there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who enjoy their task. They enjoy the objective of the company. They strive. And right now, they’re facing very hard choices, specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties simply to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to provide this number of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite perhaps setting the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: employment That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: employment Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site terms of usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for more info.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its last kind and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.